Overview

Kurlfriend is a mobile platform that empowers users with kinky and curly textured hair make confident care decisions through ingredient analysis, routine tracking, and personalized discovery.

This project reframes hair care from scattered research content consumption to efficient, intentional decision support. Enabled to track routines, analyze product ingredients, discover DIY treatments, and make informed care decisions based on their specific texture and goals, users are provided with an accessible every day tool born out of a wealth of cultural knowledge.

Role:

Concept, Research, UX architecture, Interface Design, Testing/Validation

Problem

Core Issues

Individuals with textured hair must conduct extensive independent research and often expensive trial & error to determine:

  • Which products are compatible with their texture

  • Whether ingredients are safe, harmful, and or may stagnate hair goals

  • Which routines support long-term hair health

  • How to execute or maintain specific styles

Without a centralized resource, decisions are slow, uncertain, and often costly.
Users are not just buying products — they are managing a continuous learning process.

Key Behavioral Patterns

Users consistently reported needing to research before purchasing or trying anything new. Many rely on multiple platforms simultaneously to validate decisions. 
Hair care decisions are strongly tied to trust, ingredient transparency, and evidence that a product works for a similar hair type. 
Participants emphasized wanting control over their hair routines without constant reliance on stylists or expensive experimentation. 

Research
Research included interviews, secondary research on kinky & curly hair care practices and historical limitations, and usability testing of early prototypes.

Insight
Textured hair care is not just a maintenance routine — it is an ongoing knowledge practice shaped by community, identity, and lived experience.

Kurlfriend as a consumer learning system

Early Mockups

These low-fidelity wireframes were used to map the product as a learning system rather than a collection of features. The focus was on exploring and narrowing down potential entry points (scan, ingredient profile, quizzes), defining how knowledge moves between surfaces, and reducing decision friction before introducing visual design.

Discovery

Ingredient Intelligence

Primary entry point for education-driven users

  • Structured ingredient database (pantry, herbal, oils, water-soluble, etc)

  • Ingredient → benefits → compatibility → related DIY recipes

  • Supports understanding before purchase

Design intent: transform raw information into actionable interpretation

Product Discovery via Search or Scan

Primary entry point for in-store decisions

  • Barcode scan → safety rating → ingredient breakdown

  • Direct path to alternatives and purchase links

  • Converts uncertainty into a clear decision moment

Design intent: compress research into seconds at point of need.

Evaluation

DIY Formulation Layer

Bridges knowledge and action

  • Recipe library tied to ingredient database

  • Ingredients suggest DIY treatments

  • Supports experimentation with structure

Design intent: empower users to act on knowledge, not just consume it.

Product Discovery via Search or Scan

Primary entry point for in-store decisions

  • Barcode scan → safety rating → ingredient breakdown

  • Direct path to alternatives and purchase links

  • Converts uncertainty into a clear decision moment

Design intent: compress research into seconds at point of need.

Memory

Knowledge Memory (Profile & Collections)

Where learning compounds

  • Saved ingredients, products, routines

  • Personal collections

  • Persistent knowledge ownership

Design intent: make progress visible and reusable.

Evaluation

DIY Formulation Layer

Bridges knowledge and action

  • Recipe library tied to ingredient database

  • Ingredients suggest DIY treatments

  • Supports experimentation with structure

Design intent: empower users to act on knowledge, not just consume it.

Product Discovery via Search or Scan

Primary entry point for in-store decisions

  • Barcode scan → safety rating → ingredient breakdown

  • Direct path to alternatives and purchase links

  • Converts uncertainty into a clear decision moment

Design intent: compress research into seconds at point of need.

Interaction Architecture Summary

Users can enter anywhere and stay oriented.

Examples of intentional cross-surface flow:

Scan → ingredient breakdown → related DIY

Ingredient → compatible products → save

Home → recommendation → evaluate → collect

Impact: flexibility without loss of mental model.

Usability Testing & Iterations

Product Evaluation Clarity

Early testing showed that qualitative signals alone required more reading and slowed decision-making. The updated design introduces a visualized quantitative Kurlfriend rating as an immediate indicator while retaining the descriptive safety explanation for context. Iconography was also simplified and the bookmark control was redesigned as a clear state-based save action, improving recognition and reducing hesitation during evaluation.

Guided Ingredient Exploration

The original ingredient directory presented a comprehensive but cognitively heavy list. The revised design introduces a category-based exploration layer at the top of the screen, allowing users to filter ingredients by type and navigate the database more intentionally, reframing the experience from browsing a list to exploring an organized space catered to your interests or available resources.

Previous
Previous

Graphic Design & Art Direction — Ami Colé

Next
Next

Packaging & Brand Design — Skope